“Poetic language may allow a reader to experience, rather than simply understand cognitively, the problem or issue the text presents.” This possible effect of the poetic use of language called the “experience” effect can be illustrated by Wallace Stevens’ poem "The Snow Man," and essay “The Noble Rider and the Sound of Words.”
Firstly, during our joint session we said that a poem is something that we experience. And that is true about the poem “The Snow Man” as, by reading the first lines, readers can easily represent the scene in their minds thanks to the style of writing and to the imaged description of the scene: One must have a mind a winter
To regard the frost and the boughs
Of pine-trees crusted with snow;
And have been cold a long time
To behold the junipers shagged with ice
Besides, we can assume that many readers have already “experienced” winter with the snow, the cold or the sight of a winter landscape. As a result, they can “experience” the poem at it reminds them of their own experiences, emotions and feelings.
Secondly, we can illustrate this point by referring to one of Stevens’ essays, “The Noble Rider and the Sound of Words” in which he talks about the notion of interdependence between imagination and reality in poetry. Thus, another way of “experiencing” is by the words themselves and the sounds of the words. He writes page 32 that “the deepening need for words to express our thoughts and feelings which, we are sure, are all the truth that we shall ever experience” and “words are thoughts …above everything else, poetry is words; and that words, above everything else, are, in poetry, sounds.” In other words, the nature of poetry is to take the words already existing (who are part of the reality) and then to use them to create an imaginary scene. Thus the readers can “experience” a reality that they already know such as remembering the emotions related to the snow, or they can “experience” something they do not know (for example imagining the sight of “the pine-trees crusted with snow”). He adds page 30 that “The poetic process is psychologically an escapist process.” This quote is a good example to illustrate this “experience" effect.
Julie,
ReplyDeleteThis is a lovely post. You nuance the sense of "experience" nicely by pointing to the different kinds of things we mean when we talk about "the experience of the poem." By my count, you describe 3 kinds of experience here: the poet's past experience of the event or object described, the reader's past experience of same, and the reader's experience reading the poem (hearing the sound of the words, imagining the scene, etc.) I might add a fourth: the writer's experience of writing, or as Stevens puts it in "Of Modern Poetry," the experience of "the mind in the act of finding what will suffice"
I wish to consider the "four" dinstinct and distinguishable kinds of experience that Julie and professor Case hashed out for us.
ReplyDeleteThe personal sphere of experience or what Bertrand Russell calls an individual's "biography" between a 19th century poet (writer's experience writing) and and a 21st century reader (reader's experience) are fundamentally different. These two worlds never, especially "physically" speaking, collide. However, when an individual has the experience of reading a poem something suprasensible happens, doesn't it? We are suddenly able to transcend time and space, feel emotional empathy, and relate about objects of experience. The writer's thoughts, and the emotions he felt, can be catapulted to the future and shared with an unassuming freshman. Never underestimate the power of ideas--they can travel faster than the speed of light.
This reminds me a lot about what we were talking about in class: how does Philosophy and poetry relate? And I think your quotes and your 4 experiences have so much to do with that question. Poetry is supposed be about emotions- our emotional connection to the world around us and each other, and even to ourselves. While Philosophy is supposed to be about seeking out the truth, but when philosophying about truths, as expressed in pragmatism, we can't seperate our emotions. In that way these experiences (with the writer trying to work out emotions, trying to express emotions through words, the reader trying to understand the poet, and the reader connecting with the words from their own personal experience) are the only powerful way of pursuing the truth about our emotions.
ReplyDeleteIt forces the reader to become the philosopher.
Due to my Secondary Education major, I can't help but think about how controversial this conversation about poetry meaning something different to different people would be in a classroom.